Skip to content

[PWGHF,PWGJE] Add variables to derivedDataCreatorBplusToD0Pi.cxx#15349

Open
atavirag wants to merge 5 commits intoAliceO2Group:masterfrom
atavirag:add-vars-bplus
Open

[PWGHF,PWGJE] Add variables to derivedDataCreatorBplusToD0Pi.cxx#15349
atavirag wants to merge 5 commits intoAliceO2Group:masterfrom
atavirag:add-vars-bplus

Conversation

@atavirag
Copy link
Contributor

The purpose of this PR is to add extra variables needed to study the viability of using GNNs for HF selection.

Tagging @deepathoms @alphaflores

Please consider the following formatting changes to AliceO2Group#15349
@alibuild
Copy link
Collaborator

Error while checking build/O2Physics/o2 for 993ab36 at 2026-03-12 12:25:

## sw/BUILD/O2Physics-latest/log
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/15349-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGHF/TableProducer/derivedDataCreatorBplusToD0Pi.cxx:208:13: error: 'invMassD0' may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/15349-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGHF/TableProducer/derivedDataCreatorBplusToD0Pi.cxx:208:13: error: 'invMassD0' may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/15349-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGHF/TableProducer/derivedDataCreatorBplusToD0Pi.cxx:208:13: error: 'invMassD0' may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/15349-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGHF/TableProducer/derivedDataCreatorBplusToD0Pi.cxx:208:13: error: 'invMassD0' may be used uninitialized [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

Full log here.

@vkucera vkucera marked this pull request as draft March 12, 2026 12:04
@vkucera vkucera marked this pull request as ready for review March 13, 2026 13:49
@alibuild
Copy link
Collaborator

Error while checking build/O2Physics/o2 for 1e12da9 at 2026-03-13 17:21:

## sw/BUILD/O2Physics-latest/log
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/15349-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGJE/Core/JetHFUtilities.h:1358:17: error: no match for call to '(o2::framework::Produces<o2::soa::Table<o2::aod::Hash<703906712>, o2::aod::Hash<3247407173>, o2::aod::Hash<3168903298> > >) (const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&)'
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/15349-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGJE/Core/JetHFUtilities.h:1373:18: error: no match for call to '(o2::framework::Produces<o2::soa::Table<o2::aod::Hash<1063605839>, o2::aod::Hash<2419091464>, o2::aod::Hash<3168903298> > >) (const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&)'
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/15349-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGJE/Core/JetHFUtilities.h:1358:17: error: no match for call to '(o2::framework::Produces<o2::soa::Table<o2::aod::Hash<703906712>, o2::aod::Hash<3247407173>, o2::aod::Hash<3168903298> > >) (const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&)'
/sw/SOURCES/O2Physics/15349-slc9_x86-64/0/PWGJE/Core/JetHFUtilities.h:1373:18: error: no match for call to '(o2::framework::Produces<o2::soa::Table<o2::aod::Hash<1063605839>, o2::aod::Hash<2419091464>, o2::aod::Hash<3168903298> > >) (const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&, const float&)'
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.

Full log here.

@vkucera vkucera marked this pull request as draft March 13, 2026 16:27
@vkucera
Copy link
Collaborator

vkucera commented Mar 13, 2026

@atavirag Did you compile the changes?

@atavirag
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @vkucera, I did, but I did not get these errors locally:
output.log

@vkucera
Copy link
Collaborator

vkucera commented Mar 16, 2026

Hi @vkucera, I did, but I did not get these errors locally: output.log

The log comes from a recompilation of PWGHF. There are no mentions of recompiling PWGJE.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the pwgje label Mar 18, 2026
@atavirag atavirag changed the title [PWGHF] Add variables to derivedDataCreatorBplusToD0Pi.cxx [PWGHF, PWGJE] Add variables to derivedDataCreatorBplusToD0Pi.cxx Mar 19, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title [PWGHF, PWGJE] Add variables to derivedDataCreatorBplusToD0Pi.cxx [PWGHF,PWGJE] Add variables to derivedDataCreatorBplusToD0Pi.cxx Mar 19, 2026
@atavirag atavirag marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2026 14:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants